Erick Rudiak. Songwriter. Singer. Human. - From Erick's brain to the Internet's prying little ears.

It was bound to happen.

Posted by erickru on April 07, 2010  •  Leave comment (0)

When I was a rookie open mic performer, I had a terrible habit of getting on stage, blasting through three songs back-to-back, and then being disappointed with the resultant golf-claps from a disinterested audience. At first, I convinced myself that I really had to have a great opening line/stanza to a song to get people interested, and this approach earned me a little more attention from my crowds... but not all that much. It took a close friend to remind me that what the performers I admired most did was tell stories -- get vulnerable -- at the mic, and that I needed to do the same if I wanted people to maintain interest in a song from beginning to end. Besides the obvious, another benefit to this approach was that I gained the ability to set up a line that's halfway into a song with a good introduction; a strong opening line no longer had to carry the remaining 2 or 3 minutes.

Having learned my lesson, I've been introducing Sister Mary Catherine with a disclaimer, a preemptive apology, and an explanation that the titular character was my attempt to create my own personal, unattainable ideal, and definitely not a metaphor carrying some greater message. I always worried that someone would be put off by the story, and I've had my share of audience members jokingly tell me that I'm going to hell for that song, but always in an I'll-be-right-there-with-you-for-enjoying-it sort of way. Over time, I've added color to the story with details about my own rather unorthodox religious upbringing -- a major reason why the character is who she is -- and how, as an adult, I felt lucky to have stumbled upon people who shared my experience. Focused on the possibility of someone taking umbrage with the character I created, I didn't see it coming when, after performing Sister Mary Catherine at the most excellent Brothers K open mic last month, I was approached by a very nice, older man who politely expressed what can only be described as a cocktail of pity and disgust at the introduction itself.

Was it simply my particular point on the secular/nonsecular spectrum? Was it because I made light of a topic that is so serious to so many? Was the juxtaposition with the previous song simply too much? Should I have just stuck to reminiscing about the Hamptons scene in Annie Hall? I'll probably never know. My critic offered to send me a book that would change my entire outlook on the question of religion, and followed through the very next weekend. I suspect its effect was not the intended one, but I must thank Leonid K______ for the effort: it led to a wonderful heart-to-heart with my dad that probably wouldn't have happened without Leonid's enzymatic input. Plus, now I have an even better story with which to introduce that song.


Warning: bigger-than-your-typical-YouTube-size video above

one stone, many birds

Posted by erickru on January 19, 2010  •  Leave comment (0)

In addition to making up for a ridiculous gap between posts, and ringing in the new year with a new photo gallery feature, this post should also serve the additional purpose of knocking post #50 off the front page, which means no more funny errors for Internet Explorer users (thanks, TG, for the pro bono website QA).

New Year's Frost Navy Pier Carousel Graceland Stained Glass Grand Junction, CO

No greater anger? Really?

Posted by erickru on August 09, 2007  •  Leave comment (1)

Sadly, this didn't come from The Onion.

"This scares me politically. There is no anger that comes close to the anger of an American that cannot get television," Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said at a hearing last month.


Source: USA Today | TV's digital switchover has a downside.




Another statistical aberration.

Posted by erickru on April 03, 2007  •  Leave comment (0)



Today, chicagopublicradio.org is featuring another one of my photos on its front page (see this post from last year). Point 1: thanks, Andrew! Point 2: hello, CPR website patrons. More of my Chicago photos are on flickr. Point 3: this really is a statistical aberration: CPR has been incredibly kind to me, but something tells me that since it's them and only them, if I'd been taking pictures of San Diego or The Land of AK 47's, I wouldn't be getting any attention at all.

My very own OINY moment

Posted by erickru on October 26, 2006  •  Leave comment (1)



photo credit: wrc

I had a genuine Overheard In New York moment at the show this past Sunday (which rawked, by the way -- thanks to all the folks who packed Brothers K. Coffee to the gills). After finishing my set, I was thoroughly enjoying hearing Poltz for the second time in three days and chatting with some of the crowd. Someone asked about my shirt. Here's what the OINY editors might have done with the episode:

The back reads 'you are now on our no-fly list.'

Patron: What does your shirt say?
Me: "I am not a terrorist."
Patron: Cool. I knew it was something Arabic.

-- Brothers K. Coffee
Overheard by: far too few people


P.S. If you would like to advertise your non-terrorist status, get the shirt. Oh, and rest assured that I will be posting audio from the show as soon as I can get some quality editing time in.

The Nuk threat

Posted by erickru on July 06, 2006  •  Leave comment (0)

No, this isn't about Korea or Iran or some other axis-of-evil concern. We're talking about the Nuk (TM) pacifier (our boy's preferred brand - yes, you CAN be seven weeks old and have preferred brands). Flying out of New Orleans a few weeks ago, we were passing through security when the agent shuffling us past the metal detector requested that my wife remove the pacifier from the baby's mouth and put it through the X-ray along with our keys, etc. The pacifier. From the baby's mouth. Now I know we may be closer than some parents out there to having DCFS take a second look at our child care tactics (no, we do NOT wipe the pacifier with a sterile pad every time it hits the floor) but really: would we actually have placed something that posed a threat to the safety of a commercial airliner IN HIS MOUTH? Yeah, I feel supa-safe now. Thanks, TSA!

Note: for those that might want to get actual use out of this post, see this page on the TSA's website that does give very good instructions on traveling with children and what to expect -- the vast majority of the time, screeners have remained true to the guidelines posted here, so I'm thinking that the MSY check was a judgement call, which brings up all sorts of other interesting questions.